Transcript
10-07-22 Complaint for Public Corruption and racketeering against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, RE: Conduct of pretense appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – alleged real estate fraud and racketeering by the LA Superior Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, July 22 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption and racketeering in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights. Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud and racketeering at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared on the schedule of the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal. Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”. Table 1: Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court Date Judge Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding Comments 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter False registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…” 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other False registration of Order Appointing Receiver. The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them denied, and the third - voluntarily dismissed. California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order. Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed: a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002. b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all. c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” Table 2: Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District Appeal # “Judgment Date” * Notice of Appeal Trial Court Judge California Court of Appeal Justices Disposition 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, DanielVogel, Charles (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinalSigned Published113 Cal.App.4th 1331 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, DanielEpstein, Norman (Concur)Hastings, J. (Concur) Affirmed in fullFinal 3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Volunta
